In regulated work, a vague requirement isn't rework. It's a finding.
In healthcare, finance, and automotive software, an untestable acceptance criterion doesn't just slow the sprint — it surfaces in validation, in UAT, or in an audit, where fixing it costs ten times more and the paper trail matters. Vindex checks every requirement for testability the day it's written, in refinement, where gaps are still cheap.
Real scores in 30 seconds. No signup, nothing to install. Your data is deleted after 24 hours.
The gap existed the day the story was written. The only question was whether it would be found in refinement or in the validation protocol.
Gaps surface at the most expensive moment
“Access is restricted appropriately” sails through refinement and dies in validation, where no one can write a test protocol against it — weeks after the code shipped to the test environment.
Auditors ask how you verify requirements
Traceability needs requirements that can be tested. A backlog full of TBDs and vague outcomes is a quality-system weakness with your name on it.
Compliance context hides in prose
The regulatory constraint is real — it's just buried in a sentence no one can act on. The story looks done; the obligation it carries isn't checkable.
What changes when testability is checked up front.
Gaps found where they're cheap
Untestable criteria get caught in refinement, not in UAT or a validation protocol — before the fix costs ten times more.
A written quality trail on every requirement
Each story carries its score and findings — evidence that requirement quality is systematically checked, not left to whoever was in the room.
Built for regulated buyers
A BAA is available for healthcare and regulated customers, demo data is deleted after 24 hours, and Vindex never trains models on your data.
Check your next release's requirements for testability.
Drop a CSV or paste one requirement — real scores in 30 seconds, no signup.